Skip to main content
STEM teacher reviewing student assessment work at a desk while a student looks on and asks a question
STEM

STEM Assessment Update Newsletter for Families

By Adi Ackerman·October 29, 2026·6 min read

Parent reviewing a student's STEM project assessment rubric at home with the student

Assessment communication in STEM is harder than in traditional academic subjects because the assessment formats are more varied, the grading criteria are less familiar to families, and the relationship between a project grade and a student's understanding is less obvious than on a multiple-choice test. A newsletter that explains how and why you assess the way you do is one of the most useful things you can send to STEM families.

Explain your assessment philosophy before grades arrive

Families who learn about a STEM assessment philosophy for the first time when they see a grade they do not understand are in the worst possible position to engage with it constructively. Send an assessment overview newsletter at the start of the year or the start of each semester that describes how you assess, what you are looking for, and how grades reflect learning.

"In this class, I assess students on both the quality of their scientific thinking and the accuracy of their conclusions. A student who designs a good experiment and collects clean data, but whose hypothesis is not supported, can earn a high grade. A student who arrives at a correct answer through sloppy procedure earns a lower grade than you might expect. The goal is to develop good science practice, and that is what I am measuring."

Walk families through your rubric before major projects

Rubrics are the most useful communication tools in STEM assessment, and the least used in family communications. Sending the rubric for a major project in the newsletter two weeks before the project is due gives families a concrete tool for supporting their student and understanding the expectations.

Do not just attach the rubric. Explain one or two of the most important criteria in plain language. "The 'Evidence Use' section of the rubric is worth the most points. Students who earn the highest score use specific data from their experiment to directly support each claim they make in their write-up. Vague references to 'the data' without specific numbers are not sufficient for top marks." That explanation is far more useful than the rubric categories alone.

Address the difference between process and product grades

One of the most common sources of parent concern in STEM is when a student's final product does not work as intended but the student still earns a good grade. This happens in engineering design challenges when a bridge fails, a robot does not complete the course, or a circuit does not light up. Families who do not understand why a student gets a B on a project that did not technically succeed need a newsletter that explains the reasoning.

"In our engineering design challenges, the final grade reflects the quality of the design process: how thoughtfully the student identified the problem, how systematically they tested and revised, and how clearly they can explain what they would do differently. A team whose bridge collapsed but whose design process was rigorous and whose reflection was honest will score higher than a team whose bridge held but who cannot explain why they made the design choices they did."

Prepare families for state science assessments specifically

NGSS-aligned state science assessments and other standardized STEM tests are often poorly understood by families who are used to the structure of traditional standardized tests. These assessments frequently use scenario-based questions that require applying science practices rather than recalling facts, which can feel unfamiliar and difficult even to strong students.

Your newsletter can set appropriate expectations. "The state science test uses scenarios that ask students to analyze data, construct explanations, and argue from evidence. It does not primarily test whether students have memorized facts. Students who have done well in our classroom activities are well prepared, even if the format feels different. The most useful test preparation is reviewing how to read and interpret data presented in unfamiliar contexts."

Create a feedback loop between assessments and home support

The most useful assessment newsletters are not just explanations of grades but guides to what families can do to support improvement. After major assessments, send a brief newsletter that names the areas where students as a group are strongest and where they need more practice, with a suggestion for how families can support each area.

"The class overall performed well on experimental design but showed gaps in written scientific explanation. If your student struggled with the explanation sections, ask them to practice explaining their reasoning aloud before writing it. Speaking the explanation first, then writing it, is a technique that significantly helps students who know the science but struggle to communicate it in writing." That guidance is specific, actionable, and converts an assessment result into a home learning strategy.

Get one newsletter idea every week.

Free. For teachers. No spam.

Frequently asked questions

How do STEM assessments differ from traditional tests and how do I explain this to families?

STEM assessments often include projects, lab reports, design challenges, presentations, and portfolios alongside traditional tests. These formats evaluate the process of thinking, not just the final answer. Families who expect only multiple-choice and short-answer tests may be confused when their child receives a rubric that grades communication, scientific reasoning, and revision as well as accuracy. Explaining this early prevents misunderstandings when grades are distributed.

How do I explain rubric-based grading to families who are used to percentage grades?

Describe what each performance level in the rubric means in behavioral terms. 'A student who earns a 4 in Scientific Reasoning can identify a problem, propose a testable hypothesis, design a controlled experiment, and explain the results using evidence. A student who earns a 2 can propose a hypothesis but needs guidance to design the experiment.' That kind of description makes the rubric readable to a parent without STEM background.

How should a newsletter address families who are concerned that STEM project grades are too subjective?

Acknowledge the concern and explain the structures that create consistency. 'We use the same rubric for all students, calibrate our scoring together as a team before grading, and give students the rubric before they start work so they know what we are looking for.' Transparency about the process is more persuasive than defending the principle of performance-based assessment.

How do I communicate about standardized STEM assessments like NGSS-aligned state tests?

Explain what the test measures, how it differs from classroom assessments, when it happens, and what families should tell students about it. Many families do not know whether state science tests count toward grades, whether they affect school ratings, or whether their child needs to prepare specifically. Answering those questions in a newsletter prevents the anxiety that vague preparation notices create.

How does Daystage help STEM teachers communicate assessment information to families?

Daystage lets STEM teachers send assessment-specific newsletters as part of their regular communication routine, so families receive grade explanations and rubric breakdowns in the same trusted channel as their regular updates.

Adi Ackerman

Adi Ackerman

Author

Adi Ackerman is a former classroom teacher and curriculum writer with 8 years in K-8 schools. She writes about school communication, parent engagement, and what actually works in real classrooms.

Ready to send your first newsletter?

3 newsletters free. No credit card. First one ready in under 5 minutes.

Get started free