Skip to main content
Washington state school board members at a public governance meeting with community families and staff present
School Board

Washington School Board Newsletter Guide: Communicating Governance After McCleary

By Adi Ackerman·June 25, 2026·6 min read

Washington district administrator reviewing board newsletter content with Washington state assessment data at a desk

Washington school boards govern nearly 300 school districts in a state whose school funding history has been shaped by the McCleary Supreme Court case, which found the state was failing its constitutional obligation to fully fund basic education. The legislature's response to McCleary restructured how Washington funds schools, significantly increased state funding, and placed new limits on local enrichment levies. Understanding this context is essential for communicating effectively with families about school finance in Washington. A consistent, honest board newsletter that explains this framework is one of the most useful services a Washington board can provide.

This guide covers what Washington school board newsletters should include, how to communicate on the issues most relevant to Washington districts, and how to build community trust through regular, transparent governance communication.

Board meeting decisions with context for Washington families

Washington board meeting summaries should explain what was decided and why. For each significant decision, provide the context families need: what problem was addressed, what alternatives were evaluated, and why this path was chosen. Washington communities have high expectations for school governance transparency, and boards that communicate substantively meet those expectations more effectively than those that produce minimal summaries.

SBA and Smarter Balanced assessment results

Washington administers Smarter Balanced assessments in English language arts and mathematics and the Washington Comprehensive Assessment of Science. When results are released, board newsletters should address them directly. Report scores by school and grade level, explain what the data means, describe the board's response to areas of underperformance, and acknowledge strong results. Washington State Report Card indicators also include graduation rates and other measures that newsletters should address when updated.

McCleary funding context and what it means locally

Washington's McCleary legislation significantly restructured how schools are funded, increasing state basic education funding while restricting local enrichment levies. Board newsletters should explain how the district is funded under the post-McCleary system: what basic education funding the state provides, what local enrichment levies are permitted to fund, and how the board is managing resources within this framework. Families who understand the McCleary context are better positioned to engage with both local and state leaders about education funding adequacy.

Local enrichment levy communication in Washington

Washington limits local enrichment levies that districts can seek from voters. When a levy election is approaching, board newsletters should communicate clearly and factually: what the levy would fund, how it relates to the McCleary basic education framework, what the property tax impact would be, and how long the levy runs. Washington law restricts school district advocacy in elections, but factual education communication is permitted and important for informing voters.

State policy changes and local implementation

Washington's Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction and the legislature regularly produce policy changes that local boards must implement. When those changes affect families directly, board newsletters should translate them into plain language: what changed, what the district is doing, and what families need to know. Boards that interpret OSPI guidance in local terms serve their communities more effectively.

Community participation in Washington board governance

Washington's Open Public Meetings Act ensures that board meetings are publicly accessible. Board newsletters should preview upcoming agenda items, explain significant decisions, and provide clear information on how to attend, comment, and participate. Advisory committee openings and community listening sessions should be promoted with specific logistics.

Using Daystage for Washington board newsletters

Daystage supports Washington school boards in building a consistent, professional newsletter practice. Design a monthly template with standard sections: meeting summary, SBA results, McCleary and levy context, budget information, and participation opportunities. Boards that communicate consistently and explain Washington's distinctive funding environment build the community understanding that sustains investment in local schools.

Board elections and communication continuity in Washington

Washington school board elections occur in November of odd-numbered years for most districts. Newsletter communication should be designed as an institutional function that persists through membership changes. Introduce new members, acknowledge departing members, and maintain the same structure and publication schedule across election cycles. Consistent communication signals institutional stability and accountability.

Get one newsletter idea every week.

Free. For teachers. No spam.

Frequently asked questions

What should a Washington school board newsletter include?

Board meeting decisions with explanations, SBA and SBAC assessment results, Washington State Report Card indicators, McCleary funding context and local levy information, policy changes, and specific community participation opportunities. Washington boards that explain the reasoning behind decisions build stronger community trust.

How often should Washington school boards publish a newsletter?

Monthly publication aligned with the regular board meeting cycle is appropriate for most Washington districts. Washington's post-McCleary funding environment, including changes to local levy authority, creates ongoing communication needs around how school funding works and what local levies are permitted to fund.

What is the McCleary decision and how should Washington boards explain it?

The McCleary decision by the Washington Supreme Court found that the state was not fulfilling its constitutional obligation to fully fund basic education. The legislature responded with significant increases in state funding and restrictions on local enrichment levies. Board newsletters should explain how McCleary changed school funding in Washington, what the district receives in state basic education funding, and what local levies can and cannot fund under current law.

How should Washington boards communicate about local enrichment levies?

Washington limits local enrichment levies that districts can seek from voters to supplement state basic education funding. When a levy election is approaching, board newsletters should explain what the levy would fund, how it relates to the McCleary funding framework, what the cost would be for property owners, and how long the levy would run. Washington law restricts district advocacy in elections, so boards must communicate factually.

How does Daystage support Washington school board communication?

Daystage gives Washington school boards a professional newsletter platform for consistent, clear board communication. Build a monthly template with standard sections covering meeting summaries, SBA results, McCleary and levy context, budget information, and community participation. Consistent communication that explains Washington's complex funding environment builds community understanding and trust.

Adi Ackerman

Adi Ackerman

Author

Adi Ackerman is a former classroom teacher and curriculum writer with 8 years in K-8 schools. She writes about school communication, parent engagement, and what actually works in real classrooms.

Ready to send your first newsletter?

3 newsletters free. No credit card. First one ready in under 5 minutes.

Get started free