School Newsletter: Non-Custodial Parent Access and Communication

Custody arrangements have become more complex over the past two decades. An increasing number of students live in arrangements where the school communicates primarily with one parent while the other parent has legal rights to the same information but is not automatically included in the communication loop. Understanding what the law requires and building systems that serve every parent appropriately protects the school legally and supports student wellbeing.
What FERPA Actually Says About Non-Custodial Parents
FERPA's starting position is clear: both natural parents have equal rights to access their child's education records, regardless of custody status, unless a court order or state statute specifically restricts that right. The regulation explicitly notes that a school may not withhold records from a non-custodial parent solely because the other parent or the student objects. The exception is a court order that specifically addresses school record access. A general custody agreement that grants physical custody to one parent does not automatically restrict the other parent's school record rights unless the custody agreement specifically includes that limitation.
What Counts as an Education Record
School newsletters and general parent communications are a gray area in FERPA because they are sent to all families, not pulled from a specific student's file. The more relevant legal principle for newsletters is that a non-custodial parent who requests to be included in school communications that all other families receive has a strong legal argument for that inclusion. A school that routinely sends newsletters to one parent and excludes the other, without a court order requiring that exclusion, creates legal exposure. The safest practice is to include both parents in all general communications by default.
The Enrollment Form Is Where This Gets Fixed
The most common reason non-custodial parents miss school newsletters is that the enrollment form only captures one parent's contact information and the school never follows up to ask whether additional parents should be added. Change your enrollment form to ask: "Are there additional parents, guardians, or other adults with legal rights who should receive school communications? Please list their names and contact information." This question, asked at enrollment, surfaces non-custodial parents who want to be included and creates a natural documentation trail for those who do not respond.
Handling a Custodial Parent Who Requests Exclusion
A custodial parent who contacts the school and requests that the newsletter not be sent to the other parent is making a request the school typically cannot honor without legal documentation. The appropriate response is to acknowledge the request, explain that the school's default policy is to include both parents in general communications unless directed otherwise by a court order, and ask the parent to provide documentation of any court restrictions. Do not simply comply with the verbal request. Document the conversation and your response in the student's administrative file.
Template: Non-Custodial Parent Newsletter Subscription Language
Here is language for the school's website and enrollment materials explaining newsletter access:
"School Newsletter Subscriptions
[School Name] sends a monthly newsletter to all families of enrolled students. Both parents and any additional legal guardians are welcome to subscribe to receive the newsletter directly.
If you are a parent or legal guardian who is not currently receiving our newsletter, please contact the main office at [phone] or email [address] with your name and email address. We will add you to the distribution list.
If you have questions about newsletter access related to your family's custody arrangement, please contact the main office. We will work with you and, if needed, with the district's legal office to ensure communications are handled appropriately."
When a Non-Custodial Parent Is Restricted by Court Order
When a school receives a court order that restricts a non-custodial parent's access to their child or to school records, document the order in the student's file, note the specific restrictions (some orders restrict physical access to the school building but not record access), and implement the restrictions consistently across all communication systems. A restriction that is entered in the student information system but never communicated to the front office or the newsletter distribution list is a restriction in name only. Implementation has to be complete across every communication channel.
When Parents Share Custody and Both Want Separate Communications
In joint custody arrangements, both parents may have separate households and want the newsletter to come to their own email directly rather than being forwarded by the other parent. This is a reasonable request that schools can easily accommodate by adding both email addresses to the distribution list. Making this clear in your enrollment materials, "If both parents would like to receive the newsletter separately, list both email addresses," eliminates the friction that currently leads many non-custodial parents to discover months into the year that they have been missing school communications.
Get one newsletter idea every week.
Free. For teachers. No spam.
Frequently asked questions
Does a non-custodial parent have the right to receive school newsletters?
Under FERPA, both parents have the right to access their child's education records, including school communications, unless a court order specifically limits that access. A non-custodial parent generally has the legal right to receive school newsletters even if they do not have physical custody, unless the school has been provided with a court order that restricts their access. Schools should not rely on the custodial parent's preference to exclude the non-custodial parent from communications without reviewing the actual court documentation.
What documentation should a school require before limiting a non-custodial parent's newsletter access?
A school must have an actual court order or custody agreement that specifically restricts the non-custodial parent's access to school records or communications before denying them receipt of school newsletters. A parent's statement that the other parent 'should not get communications' is not sufficient. The school needs to review the legal document, note which specific limitations it contains, and document when and how those limitations were implemented. Schools should consult with district legal counsel when a custody dispute involves school communications.
How should enrollment forms handle non-custodial parent contact information?
Enrollment forms should ask for contact information for all adults with legal parenting rights who wish to receive school communications, not just the primary custodial parent. Ask 'Are there additional parents or guardians who should receive school communications? If yes, please provide their contact information.' This open question captures non-custodial parents, step-parents with parental rights, and other legal guardians without requiring families to explain their specific custody arrangement during enrollment.
What happens when two parents have conflicting requests about newsletter access?
When both parents make conflicting requests, the default under FERPA is to provide access to both unless there is a court order restricting one parent's access. Schools should not take sides in custody disputes. If a situation is complex or contentious, involve the principal, the district's legal counsel, and document every decision made with the legal rationale. Err on the side of providing access rather than restricting it when there is ambiguity about what the court order requires.
Can Daystage support sending newsletters to multiple parent contacts per student?
Yes. Daystage allows multiple email addresses per student account, so both parents can receive the newsletter regardless of their custody arrangement. Setting up each parent as a separate subscriber means each receives their own copy directly, with no dependency on the other parent forwarding communications. For schools with a significant number of split-custody families, this feature eliminates one of the most common sources of parent complaints about unequal information access.

Adi Ackerman
Author
Adi Ackerman is a former classroom teacher and curriculum writer with 8 years in K-8 schools. She writes about school communication, parent engagement, and what actually works in real classrooms.
More for Guides
Ready to send your first newsletter?
3 newsletters free. No credit card. First one ready in under 5 minutes.
Get started free