School Board Newsletter: Superintendent Annual Evaluation Results

The annual superintendent evaluation is a core governance responsibility of every school board. It holds the district's chief executive accountable to the goals the board sets, and it communicates to the community how the board is exercising its oversight function. A newsletter summarizing the evaluation results is both a transparency practice and a signal that the board takes accountability seriously.
State that the evaluation was completed and when
Open with a clear statement that the board has completed its annual evaluation of the superintendent, the date of the formal action, and the overall outcome. "The Board of Education completed its annual evaluation of Superintendent Maria Chen at its June 10 meeting and voted to extend her contract for an additional year" gives the community immediate orientation on what happened.
Summarize progress on district goals
Most superintendent evaluations are tied to specific district goals established at the beginning of the year. For each major goal area, describe what was accomplished. This is the most substantive section of the newsletter because it connects the evaluation to outcomes families care about, such as student achievement data, fiscal management, and community engagement results.
Name areas the board has identified for continued focus
An honest evaluation includes areas where progress fell short of expectations or where the board believes additional attention is needed in the coming year. Naming these areas in the newsletter is a transparency practice, not a public criticism. It tells the community that the board is conducting a real evaluation rather than a formality.
Describe any contract or compensation action taken
If the evaluation resulted in a contract extension, salary adjustment, or other formal contract action, describe that briefly. State the vote count, the nature of the action, and the new contract terms if they are a matter of public record. Transparency about compensation decisions is a basic governance norm.
Include a brief statement from the board chair
A short statement from the board chair contextualizing the evaluation, expressing the board's commitment to the superintendent's continued work, or noting the priorities ahead gives the newsletter a human governance voice rather than a purely procedural tone.
Optionally include a statement from the superintendent
If the superintendent wishes to include a brief response, noting priorities for the year ahead or expressing appreciation for the board's feedback, that is appropriate and models a healthy working relationship. Keep it brief and forward-looking.
Reinforce the board's ongoing oversight role
Close by reminding families that the superintendent evaluation is an annual practice, part of the board's ongoing commitment to district accountability. Daystage gives district communications teams the tools to send professional governance summaries like this to the full community, reinforcing that the board takes its oversight responsibility seriously every year.
Get one newsletter idea every week.
Free. For teachers. No spam.
Frequently asked questions
What can a superintendent evaluation newsletter share publicly?
Boards can share the overall evaluation outcome, progress on specific district goals tied to the evaluation criteria, areas identified for continued focus, and any changes to the superintendent's contract or compensation resulting from the evaluation. Personnel details and confidential deliberations from closed session should not be disclosed.
How do we communicate a mixed or critical evaluation professionally?
Focus on specific goal areas where progress met expectations and areas where the board expects improvement. Name the goals, not the person's general performance. A superintendent evaluation is a governance tool, not a public personnel action, and the newsletter should reflect that distinction.
Should the newsletter include the superintendent's response?
A brief statement from the superintendent acknowledging the evaluation and noting their priorities for the year ahead is appropriate if the superintendent wishes to include one. It models a healthy governance relationship and gives the community a sense of how the board and superintendent are working together.
How does a superintendent evaluation newsletter differ from a performance review?
A public newsletter is a summary communication, not a full evaluation. It describes outcomes against goals, notes contract actions, and signals the direction for the coming year. The full evaluation instrument is typically a confidential document.
How does Daystage support governance communication like this?
Daystage gives district communications teams a professional platform for sending formal board governance updates, including evaluation summaries, to the full community. Consistent, well-formatted governance communication builds public trust over time.

Adi Ackerman
Author
Adi Ackerman is a former classroom teacher and curriculum writer with 8 years in K-8 schools. She writes about school communication, parent engagement, and what actually works in real classrooms.
More for School Board
Ready to send your first newsletter?
3 newsletters free. No credit card. First one ready in under 5 minutes.
Get started free